Outgrowing the Ingrown Denomination

Christian Living, The Church, Uncategorized

(By: Matt Foreman)

I grew up in an old school Southern Baptist church – by which I mean: everything in church life revolved around the SBC.  All the literature and Sunday School curriculum were written by the Home Mission Board.  Wednesday night programs revolved around Royal Ambassadors and Girls in Action.  The Lottie Moon Christmas offering was the biggest Missions and fundraising event of the year.  Attend any SBC Church around the country and you would find the same programs and same culture of church life.  There was very little public acknowledgement or even consciousness of Christianity, it seemed, beyond those boundaries.

Eventually, I was converted while attending a Reformed campus ministry and Reformed Baptist Church in college.  The church culture was very different.  Theology, Christian literature and church history were all very important.  There was a much broader awareness and fellowship across denominational lines by virtue of a shared theology.  In fact, there seemed actually a closer affinity with believers from other Reformed denominations than even with other Baptists.  I ultimately attended a Reformed Presbyterian seminary.  Most of the students were themselves Presbyterian, but there were also Episcopalians, Congregationalists, non-denominational types, and other Baptists.  While I remained a Baptist and actually grew in my ecclesiological convictions, I still appreciated and valued this broader fellowship and cooperation.  To this day, I appreciate groups like the Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals or conferences like Together for the Gospel that affirm the importance of ecclesiology, don’t downplay ecclesiological differences, but still recognize and share fellowship on the basis of a unity around the Gospel.

Several years ago, Al Mohler wrote an influential essay entitled, “A Call for Theological Triage and Christian Maturity”, in which he delineated three levels of theological priority.  First order issues are Gospel issues, doctrinal beliefs that are essential to the Christian faith, that make someone a Christian or not.  Second order issues are issues that divide denominations – like baptism and church government.  Mohler writes, “Believing Christians may disagree on the second-order issues, though this disagreement will create significant boundaries between believers.”  Meanwhile, third order issues, Mohler says, “are doctrines over which Christians may disagree and remain in close fellowship, even within local congregations.”

Three Tiers of Ecclesiological Cooperation
Taking these distinctions in reverse, I would like to propose that Reformed Baptists should have three tiers of closer ecclesiastical cooperation and interest.  Tier 1 is the work of your own church.  Tier 2 is working with other churches who share your own ecclesiastical commitments and with whom you can work most closely for the work of planting other churches, cooperation in missions, etc.  Tier 3 is working with those from other Reformed denominations who agree with you theologically on the basics of the Gospel, the authority of Scripture, etc.  (Some might add a fourth tier for looser fellowship with broad evangelicals.)

It is my conviction that a healthy interchange needs all three tiers.  Some very independent churches may only have Tier 1.  Some denominationally-focused churches may only have Tiers 1 and 2.  Some looser affiliated churches may only have Tiers 1 and 3.  But I think we need and benefit from all 3.

Put another way, my thesis is this: As a Baptist, while I believe in the independence of the local church, I also believe (with historical precedent) that Baptists should be involved in formal Associations.  But in addition, those churches and Associations should also have an outward impulse, an open hand to broader fellowship across denominational lines, seeking to humbly contribute to the larger Reformed communion.

First, we should recognize that our ecclesiological convictions are important and have implications for the long-term health and discipleship of individuals and churches.  On this basis, when it comes to cooperation with other churches – if we are clear on our convictions (on the sacraments, on church government, on church membership), and believe that these are important for the long-term health of the church – it makes sense that we will be able to work most freely and closely with those who share those same convictions.  Associations also provide a certain level of healthy accountability.  Put bluntly: it can keep you from being overly weird and idiosyncratic.  It provides a larger communion for counsel, for fellowship, for help and resources.  And there is an agreed upon theological and ecclesial basis for trust and freedom to work together.

But in addition, in our present culture that is increasingly hostile to Christianity, it is important to stand with true Christians from other camps – strategically and purposefully.  (The early Particular Baptists, in a time of persecution from the State church, very publicly announced their theological unity and stood with their Congregationalist and Presbyterian cousins when they published the London Confession of Faith, based on the Westminster and Savoy Confessions.)  It is important to affirm God’s work among these other churches, to teach our people to appreciate and value God’s sovereign work of grace in other churches.  Without giving up our convictions, it is important to express that we are not in competition, that the Gospel is central, that the kingdom is bigger than our small corner, that we are working together for the spread of Christ’s kingdom, and that we can even learn from (and pray for) others who may not share all our convictions, but still affirm the same Gospel and love the same Savior.

In other words, Reformed Baptists should seek to be actively engaged in the larger Reformed communion.  We should have an open hand to the Reformed Resurgence and even the New Calvinists.  We should be seeking to be involved and to add our voice in groups like the Alliance, like Together for the Gospel, like the Gospel Coalition.  God has been working among these groups.  We do well to listen.  And Reformed Baptists have an important voice to add.

Jesus prays for his people to be one.  The unity of the Body of Christ is a significant concern in the New Testament.  Local churches are “sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints together with all those who in every place call upon the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, both their Lord and ours” (1 Cor.1:2).  For the sake of the Gospel and the work of the Holy Spirit and the good of the church, churches need to explore and express this unity broadly within the theological boundaries of the Gospel.

**The Title of this article is deliberately borrowed from C. John Miller’s book, “Outgrowing the Ingrown Church.”

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “Outgrowing the Ingrown Denomination

  1. One matter to consider in cooperating with, say New Covenant or New Calvinists (Tier 3) is that, if the young in our church – particularly our unbelieving children, even if well taught in our Confessional position , if exposed to these erant views, are quite likely to jump ship, marry into, or pursue a course in league with these aberrant views of scripture. It is happening now even without deliberate cooperation. We know that in the normal course of events they will be exposed to much that will challenge what they are being taught. But isn’t there a difference in deliberately fostering a relationship? How are we to know we are not dealing with unbelievers? If their teaching is quoted and upheld as authoritative, credible and valuable, how are the young and vulnerable to discriminate? Would not 2 Cor. 6: 14 to 7:1 be pertinent here? After all, these are folk who would happily undermine our position on the importance of the law (especially the Lord’s day), the complete sufficiency of scripture, worship that is reverential and faithful to scripture – – are those trifling matters? Dialogue by those mature in the faith? By all means. Deliberate fraternization? No!

    1. As far as I can tell, the Lord requires that Christians marry 1. Other Christians and 2. The opposite sex. Those are the requirements. So in this case, 2 Corinthians 6:14-7:1 has no application whatsoever. And in fact, to suggest that it might is troubling to me, as it suggests that our brethren who are “new Calvinists” or NCT aren’t Christians at all!

      I am reminded of a marvelous quote from Dr. Sinclair Ferguson: “As a kind of sideline observer I see people becoming the ‘new reformed’ of our time and people from the ‘old reformed’ sometimes jumping on their heads because they don’t get it all together instantaneously. And I want to say, ‘I thought you believed in the sovereignty of God and learned to be patient with people!'”

      I trust that by God’s grace, if I am training my children according to the Scriptures, that God will bless my efforts, and I pray He will be pleased to save them. If he does, I also want my children to have convictions that are informed by the Scriptures and that they know why they believe what they believe so that they can make informed decisions when it comes to marriage and whether or not there are certain areas in which they are willing to disagree with a potential spouse. I am fully convinced that a young person considering marriage who has a heart filled with the truth of God and the ability to articulate it well will be wise in choosing a partner while seeking out the wisdom of those around them. Do I want my children to marry someone who is fully on board with where I am theologically? Well, that would be fantastic! But if the person is godly and in pursuit of God, something like “new calvinism” wouldn’t give me the least bit of pause. I trust the sovereign Lord to bring correction and direction according to his will and timing.

  2. With that kind of legal mindset and doctrinal righteousness, how do I know that I’m not dealing with an unbeliever? Brother, that kind of fundamentalism is not welcome on this blog.

  3. I’ll be clearer: by doctrinal righteousness, I mean people who are trusting in their doctrinal correctness as their righteousness, as opposed to Christ as their righteousness. The difference will be marked by humility or pride. And to be direct, your pride is on display. I would rather my children marry a new Calvinist than a Pharisee.

  4. yeoldpaths,

    I don’t even know where to begin. I think Nick and Matt have ably answered your post.

    However, I’d like to add a couple of things.

    Your post comes across as viewing the truth of God as being something very FRAGILE, that needs to be protected by your form of “separation.” The way you talk about your convictions, it sounds like they are a three legged chair that needs a lot of propping. Truth that is like that is nothing like Spurgeon’s Bible (which needed no defending, it just needed to be unleashed). Nick has made good points about the sovereignty of God as well that are worth considering. Also, do you think that you not regarding these people as brothers is going to shield you children from this views which they are, in your mind, so incapable of resisting? Or is it just going to make them, comparatively speaking

    I was brought up in a denomination that very seriously abused the concept of avoiding “Fraternization” with other Christians. Sure, there is a cause for very serious and far reaching separation in some instances, but if you think people that is applicable to people who believe NCT or are “New Calvinists,” you are living in a very drear and lonely world and perhaps it is no wonder you need to shield your children so much, because you are not fostering a very inviting or winsome or appealing climate for them. Schismatics usually think they are building a utopia, but often their children and grandchildren more easily see excessive separation for what it is–ugly.

  5. On my second to last paragraph, I meant to say “Or is it just going to make them, comparatively speaking appealing?”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s